Here's some reportage of it: at io9 (whereat I learned of it), at H+, at Psychology Today.
I don't feel the need to register my skepticism-or-faith, and I hope you don't either. It's not my job to decide what must be true and what must not be true! If there's one thing about science that I'm pretty sure of, it's that well-designed studies are better qualified than my personal opinions and judgments to determine the truth of a matter.
Meanwhile, true or not, his paper is layered through with brilliant jokes. He had me laughing out loud. Are all psych papers this funny?
1. On 2010-11-09, Simon R wrote:
"Apparently there have been hundreds of requests for replication packages so other scientists can re-test Bem's experiments and see if the results come back the same."