anyway.
A Penny for Your Thoughts


On 2005-06-03, Vincent wrote:


Ethan: "My question is, for that middle thing, 'Permission to act with passion,' how would you design towards fostering that? I see that as totally a social contract level thing. I'm not picturing how a game text could influence that, beyond just saying, 'Players should give each other permission to act with passion.' Or would that be all you needed?"

Oh no, I wouldn't think so. I think you'd need pretty hardcore systemic support.

If it were me, the way I'd foster permission to act with passion is by creating security. I'll allow you to act with passion only if I know that I won't be hurt by it, is what I mean.

It's not a trivial design prob. The rules have to concretely enact your passion, make it consequential, but they also have to protect my investments in the game. In freeform games, this is the "your right to your character's fist stops at the tip of my character's nose" clause. But I think we can do better than that, as we rightly divorce "my investments" from "my character."
This reminds me...
Your initials:
Link URL:
Link text:
Please keep your link text short.
Please feel free to self-link!
If you're human:
Never mind.
Some maybe useful links:
Complete Index of Entries
Search for a Post or Comment
Search the Forge Forums

 
This makes me go...
Your initials:
Your response:
Explanation (optional):

This is for short comments, corrections, praise, me toos, stuff like that. Briefly, please!
If you're human:
Never mind.




anyway.