anyway.



thread: 2008-04-14 : Interchangeable?

On 2008-04-15, wrshamilton wrote:

I think it's hard to say with any objectivity. It's more likely that one will take two combat subsystems and call them functionally equivalent when they are defining only the variations in output that they are interested in as "function".

So I don't think it's a crime to do it, just that one's might want to be a little clearer as to what one considers the output of the function.



 

This makes...
initials
...go...
short response
optional explanation (be brief!):

if you're human, not a spambot, type "human":