anyway.



thread: 2005-05-16 : Violence

On 2005-05-18, John Harper wrote:

I don't see GreyOrm calling your ideas "naive", "unreasonable", "obsessive", or "fantastical" or that "there's no room to conclude anything different" than his POV. All of which you did, which I consider to be rude in this context. Maybe you don't see rudeness when you're doing it. See? I can play that game too.

GreyOrm was pointing out the fallacy of your post, by using an analogy (slavery). The fallacy is called coincidental correlation, by the way. You can learn more here: http://www.datanation.com/fallacies/posthoc.htm

That's a cute dig at the end, too. "... until now a very intelligent conversation." Nice one.



 

This makes...
initials
...go...
short response
optional explanation (be brief!):

if you're human, not a spambot, type "human":