thread: 2009-04-07 : 3 Resolution Systems

On 2009-04-10, Larry L wrote:


Whew. I was going to say you lost me at 1.1... I was trying, in vain, to wrap my head around how that one could possibly be dice-to-dice. If that situation represented dice-to-dice, all of the following stuff would, logically, have to be bat shit crazy gobbledygook.

Much better! It makes sense now.

(Thanks Ryan!)


This makes...
short response
optional explanation (be brief!):

if you're human, not a spambot, type "human":