anyway.



thread: 2009-04-10 : A Moment of Judgment

On 2009-04-13, Robert Bohl wrote:

"The thing about rationing is that it assumes that I, as a player, put my guy winning over a coherent SIS. Without a mutual interest in a coherent, structurally sound SIS, none of this (role-playing) can happen."

I think the ideal for me is when playing hard for my guy winning (or me, the player, winning) results in coherent SIS.



 

This makes...
initials
...go...
short response
optional explanation (be brief!):

if you're human, not a spambot, type "human":