anyway.



thread: 2009-05-05 : Reconsidering Sim (the word)

On 2009-05-06, Jim Henley wrote:

I AM talking about rgfa simulationism, put to use to serve story now and step on up game design.

Gotcha. That makes perfect sense. Even back in the day, rgfa was bothered by the fact that "sim" was defined negatively (by what it wasn't) rather than in terms of a positive program (what it was for), IIRC. What Big Model Theory has helped me see is that the reason for that is that rgfa sim can be for different things.



 

This makes...
initials
...go...
short response
optional explanation (be brief!):

if you're human, not a spambot, type "human":