thread: 2009-05-07 : Explaining the Right to Dream

On 2009-05-12, Marco wrote:

Josh, don't let Marco and John and Graham distract you, they have a long history of not believing in right to dream play.

Now, now—to be fair, I do believe in it—I just don't think:
(a) The dialog says good things about it but claims it does when cornered.
(b) That RTD + Nar + Gam encompasses all available play in any meaningful way (it clearly does in the RTD = !Nar & !GAM formulation but I don't think that describes RTD play in a useful fashion)
(c) The essay really, really adds GDS-Sim into the CA formulation in a confusing way.

But I certainly believe in it.



This makes...
short response
optional explanation (be brief!):

if you're human, not a spambot, type "human":