anyway.



thread: 2009-05-07 : Explaining the Right to Dream

On 2009-05-12, Josh W wrote:

Deal, thanks man, I think I now get what your on about. I can recognise those two as distinct motivations, but I don't see them as inherently incompatible, just that they only match up in specific situations. I'm happy to use them in that sense, and try to make peace between the two factions! So that's my last editorial on that subject, and my last post in this thread, unless you want to talk about GM work in right to dream:

I mentioned the super-butler approach to GMing, now to me that doesn't sound like he is getting the opportunity to enjoy his own right to dream, so is that what the rules are for? Taking that mediator role? Have you ever seen that done well where the GM gets to be a proper player too?



 

This makes...
initials
...go...
short response
optional explanation (be brief!):

if you're human, not a spambot, type "human":