anyway.



thread: 2009-05-07 : Explaining the Right to Dream

On 2009-05-15, Alex A. Biral wrote:

Vincent, Moreno, thanks for the replies! I think it makes more sense for me now.

If I am getting this right, the RtD agenda will always hold some element(s) of exploration as unquestionable, because the whole point of the game will be to explore the said elements (and if people changed it, the exploration would be unfaithful).

Then, Step on Up and Story Now would be easily differentiated by the fact they don't (necessarily) respect any aspects, instead changing, challenging and questioning them according to the specific agenda. In other words, in these agendas, the goal lies outside the exploration, while the Tight to Dream has some goal inside it.

Well, I hope I have understood it this time around. Sorry for the silly question, and thanks for your answers!



 

This makes...
initials
...go...
short response
optional explanation (be brief!):

if you're human, not a spambot, type "human":