anyway.



thread: 2009-12-04 : TAKE IT TO YOUR BLOG, BAKER

On 2009-12-08, Ben Lehman wrote:

Vincent did, above.

Here's some naked theory: "Aha! If my guy's holding a big gun instead of a small gun, that means that the group will readily buy into my guy hurting yours very badly." Here's the poor magician's design response: "Instead of having different gun sizes, my game has an explicit mechanism for the group agreeing how badly my guy can hurt yours."

Here the designer is referring the question of "what does the most damage" to the social contract level, rather than making a decision on the topic herself.



 

This makes...
initials
...go...
short response
optional explanation (be brief!):

if you're human, not a spambot, type "human":