anyway.



thread: 2005-03-15 : Definition: Engaged

On 2005-03-16, John Kim wrote:

I don't agree that such a boardgame is necessarily disengaged.  What you're describing is a refereed game like free kriegspiel.  The referee has final say, and so there is no guarantee that the referee won't rule against your move.  So yes, if the referee [i]does[/i] in fact block each players' input, then the game would be disengaged.  However, that's not necessarily the case.

If the referee does [i]not[/i] block players' input, but instead considers them fairly (as he is directed to do), then this can be engaged play.  I've only done one free kriegspiel-like game, but it seemed fine to me.

Now, you can also play games which don't have or need a referee.  However, there are a lot of advantages of using that position (plus disadvantages as well).



 

This makes...
initials
...go...
short response
optional explanation (be brief!):

if you're human, not a spambot, type "human":