thread: 2012-11-15 : Positioning: the Big Model vs Emily, reconciled

On 2012-11-15, Vincent wrote:

An interesting, kind of sensitive question.

In my personal thinking, the new definition here replaced the Big Model's definition long ago, it's just that I've fallen back on the convenience of "me and my character" when I've talked about it. So: I'm looking for this to supplant the Big Model's definition, utterly and finally, with the Big Model's conception surviving only in the provisional "me and my character" case.

But I'm not the editor or arbiter of the Big Model.

So either the Big Model will change to agree with me, by its own processes and following its own needs and interests, or else this represents a break with the Big Model. Either way, it's fine with me and it's not my call.


This makes ET go "Yes! This is helping reconstruct the Big Model in far more interesting ways. I'm eager for this kinda paradigm shift, ev"

This makes VB go "Don't cut yourself off, ET!"
Use the explanation box, like this.

This makes...
short response
optional explanation (be brief!):

if you're human, not a spambot, type "human":