thread: 2012-11-15 : Positioning: the Big Model vs Emily, reconciled
On 2012-11-15, Tim Ralphs wrote:
Is it intentional that the definition of positioning makes no reference to it being the consequence of other prior things? This definition seems really forward looking! For example, at the end of a campaign that we're not continuing I'd say that all players have the same total set of legitimate gameplay options available to them. Do the player whose warrior retired to become a mayor and the player whose warrior's died in action really have the same position?
I mean, I can see how if positioning is all about currency then it has to be forward looking, but it feels like a drift away from what I would have intuited the term to mean.
