anyway.



thread: 2012-11-15 : Positioning: the Big Model vs Emily, reconciled

On 2012-11-16, Tim Ralphs wrote:

Thanks Ben! (and Josh for your further clarification.)

I've found a much better way of expressing my confusion than an appeal to forward and backward perspectives. It's this: Are we saying that if a fictional element does not give rise to gameplay options then it's not a part of our position?

The whole campaign end question is me struggling to think up an example of this happening. But having written out the question like that, I'm quite satified if the answer is "Yes, that's exactly what we're saying."



 

This makes...
initials
...go...
short response
optional explanation (be brief!):

if you're human, not a spambot, type "human":