anyway.



thread: 2013-05-18 : Anyway vs G+: complicating factors

On 2013-05-18, Vincent wrote:

In principle you could. I'm sure the robots do, but I don't worry about how they'll judge me out of context.

For humans, there are enough practical challenges to create a convincing appearance of impermanence. Casually clicking on my profile and reading my posts will show you about 3/4 of the threads I've started but none of the threads that others have started that I've participated in.

And I'm a generous G+er! Most of my threads are public. Other people share only with their (usually giant, but finite) roleplaying thread, and if you aren't in it, you don't see it.

So like I say: in principle yes, but no, not really.



 

This makes CB go "makes sense!"
The permanence of blogs (and forums) is a real question. Honest discussions on G+, worthwhile stuff here?

This makes...
initials
...go...
short response
optional explanation (be brief!):

if you're human, not a spambot, type "human":