anyway.



thread: 2013-05-18 : Anyway vs G+: complicating factors

On 2013-05-20, Gordon wrote:

So, there's some vaguely-defined thing called (say) "quality" that's (for me) the purpose of having the converstaion.  "Honesty about contentious subjects" and "a worthwhile posting" both tend to enhance the quality I seek.  I think your point about G+ vs. blog is valid, but - the honest post encouraged by G+ doesn't really lead to a higher quality DISCUSSION - even when it does (which I do see it can) allow a higher quality POST.

Maybe if anyway could be a discussion of, pointer to, and more detailed/focused/"worthwhile" analysis of last week's/month's/something G+ threads, we'd get the best of it all?



 

This makes...
initials
...go...
short response
optional explanation (be brief!):

if you're human, not a spambot, type "human":