anyway.



thread: 2013-10-02 : The GM: Holding the Object for the Group

On 2013-10-07, Vincent wrote:

Dom: I think it's fair to say. Why isn't "explore" a legit object for a game?

I mean, the object of Apocalypse World is, in fact, more specific and concrete than "explore," and maybe you're missing that subtlety, sure.

But either way you could design me a game right now where the object was to explore, and why shouldn't you? Who would be able to say "that's not a legit object for a game, because it's only to explore," and be right about it? Nobody!



 

This makes...
initials
...go...
short response
optional explanation (be brief!):

if you're human, not a spambot, type "human":