anyway.



thread: 2006-01-17 : More Character Co-ownership

On 2006-01-19, Vincent wrote:

Alex:

1) you make me a circus-ninja-spy
2) you make you a circus-ninja-spy
Here's my claim:
the degree to which 1) is more problematic than 2) = the degree to which a shared story ISN'T happening.

Takes my breath away.

Takes my breath AWAY.

Everybody with it?



 

This makes MB go "I think so..."
If a shared story IS happening, then the other-contribution will be in line with that story, and feel like part of the character without undue stretching of character/story concept. Am I close?

This makes VB go "right on!"
If a shared story is happening, then (1) and (2) are equally destructive.

This makes AJF go "Thanks! Just me digesting (all) your stuff out loud."
. But re-expressing it was epiphanel, for me at least.

This makes...
initials
...go...
short response
optional explanation (be brief!):

if you're human, not a spambot, type "human":

 

 



 

This reminds AJF of The problem with Gnarliburrs?