anyway.



thread: 2006-04-10 : A problem for feminists/pro-feminists

On 2006-04-10, Julie, aka jrs wrote:

For what it's worth, yes, it is a viable solution.  I would not want my words to have more or less significance because I am female.  (Well, that is not completely true, but in the realm of discussing roleplaying it is.)  Now there may be valid reasons which are not apparent from the posed hypothetical conversations to give Mitch's or Mary's words greater weight that has nothing to do with gender.  That would be a different exercise.

I will go one step further and make a judgement call that anyone that claims that a conversation about change must be made more welcoming so that change can be stymied is not to be taken very seriously.

This all seems very obvious to me, am I missing something here?



 

This makes...
initials
...go...
short response
optional explanation (be brief!):

if you're human, not a spambot, type "human":