anyway.



thread: 2006-04-06 : I roleplay with my penis

On 2006-04-10, Vincent wrote:

Jeff, in marginalia: Given that terms like "Lumpley Principle" are in-jokey and therefore exclusionary, what's gained by adhering to them that outweighs the benefits resulting from using plain-English (or at least more communicative) terms?

Two things. One minor, one major.

The minor one is that when I use the terms, I smile. This is obviously not a good reason for anyone else to use the terms ever, under any circumstances.

The major one is that making up new terms that'll work better is totally impossible for me. I suspect it's totally impossible; I'm certain that even if it's possible for someone somewhere, I'm not that person.

I encourage anyone who thinks they can make it work to give it a go, and if they in fact CAN make it work I'll adopt their terms happily.

But this thing you're asking me to do, it's not a thing I can do.

So what's the advantage of using the bad old in-jokey terms? Well, it's not impossible, for one.



 

This makes BL go "Truth, Beauty, Charm..."
In-jokes get imbedded in canon. It happens.

This makes JW go "I feel challenged!"
Surely "Looley Palooley" isn't the most apt phrase!

This makes...
initials
...go...
short response
optional explanation (be brief!):

if you're human, not a spambot, type "human":