anyway.



thread: 2005-05-16 : Violence

On 2005-05-17, Valamir wrote:

"Chris—I agree, except I think that you are mistaking aggression for courage."

————-

I don't think he is.  For courage to be meaningful it has to be active.  Passive Courage is IMO an oxymoron and a myth.  It is itself a cop out, a form of fear justified under a veneer of passive resistance.

True courage requires action.  Courage without action is empty and pointless.  Aggression is not a four letter word that we should be afraid of.  Aggression is just effective action.  Action without aggression is limp and pointless.  It is also a cop out, a form of pretending to do something to make oneself feel better without actually having to commit.  I can't think of any effective peaceful protestor who was not aggressive.  Certainly Ghandi and MLKjr were both very aggressive in pursuit of their goals.



 

This makes...
initials
...go...
short response
optional explanation (be brief!):

if you're human, not a spambot, type "human":