anyway.



thread: 2006-05-25 : System and character sole-ownership

On 2006-05-26, Levi Kornelsen wrote:

I completely agree with what you've said here.

The only thing I'd want to question is this:

I think there's something to the idea that whomever is responsible for the integrity of a character - whoever works to hold the imaginary construct of that character together moment-to-moment - that person (or those people) can naturally be expected to feel a sense of ownership.

If you alter the dynamic of ownership in your system, you're likely altering the dynamic of that responsibility, as well.

Aren't you?



 

This makes...
initials
...go...
short response
optional explanation (be brief!):

if you're human, not a spambot, type "human":