thread: 2005-04-25 : Technical Agenda
On 2005-04-25, Victor Gijsbers wrote:
Look good. Group 2 is pretty uncontentious, I would say. I'm most interested in group 1. (And I will not talk about the )
Let me try to spell it out this way: group 1 is about where the input into the resolution mechanics comes from. Does it all come from the elements of the fictional world? Then it's Technical Simulationist. Does it all come from the actions of the players? Then it's Proceduralist. Is it hybrid, that is, players using stuff in the fictional world? Then it's Effectivist. Is that about right?
I'll have to think more about it before I can come up with useful comments.
