thread: 2006-08-16 : GenCon 06 observations 1-4
On 2006-08-17, Tris wrote:
Ron -
I'm not sure what you disagree with, but that's perhaps because I'm not talking about crossing lines. So maybe we are talking at cross purposes?
I can't find a part of my anatomy that makes a better comparison with boobies in this context.
(As an aside: If you are saying, anatomically, that cocks are closer to cunts than boobies, then yes.
If you are saying that cocks are closer to cunts than boobies in terms of what the society you live in is comfortable portraying in art then you live in a very different society to me.)
But don't get distracted by that. Most importantly, I'm NOT trying to say anything about what is or isn't crossing a line. I'm trying to delineate a position that isn't "No sex objects ever" but rather "Sex objects for everyone please. And every other imaginable role you can depict, also for everyone".
