anyway.



thread: 2006-08-27 : Kerflufflizing

On 2006-08-31, Curly wrote:

The word 'publication' literally derives from 'to make public'.

So, contrary to Ben invoking 'professional ethics', there's nothing unethical about criticising a published game in public.  The designer already agreed to public scrutiny when he moved the game from 'private' to 'public'.

My only proposal to make essential criticism happen, is to tell those currently biting their tongues that they need not do so.  Good faith dissent isn't disloyalty.



 

This makes...
initials
...go...
short response
optional explanation (be brief!):

if you're human, not a spambot, type "human":