anyway.



thread: 2006-08-27 : Kerflufflizing

On 2006-09-05, Valamir wrote:

I think intelligent criticism requires outlining however far it extends as part of the critique.  If these are "first reactions to an initial read" say so.  If they are "on the basis of a quick playtest session that abbreviated certain mechanics in the interest of time" say so.  If they include "several house rules we implemented following our initial read" say so.

I don't think one can put down a standard as to "capsule review" vs. "actual play", that debate has been raging for years...and frankly there are certain individuals I find can give a more reliable capsule review than certain other individuals can give actual play reviews.

But I think its its fair to expect full disclosure.



 

This makes...
initials
...go...
short response
optional explanation (be brief!):

if you're human, not a spambot, type "human":