anyway.



thread: 2006-09-08 : Salvation, damnation, justification, a la Sydney

On 2006-09-09, Rev. Raven Daegmorgan wrote:

Clinton,

Thank you. I did see that. Sydney's explanation for why he omitted the particular idea you note is specifically what I was asking about (though apparently not very clearly).

Obviously, I'm a big proponent of the "for me" idea. And it seems to me that while Sydney is saying these are all good paths, Christianity is the best path, and not just for him. Maybe he's not saying that, and I'm misreading him.

Sydney?



 

This makes...
initials
...go...
short response
optional explanation (be brief!):

if you're human, not a spambot, type "human":