anyway.



thread: 2005-05-16 : Violence

On 2005-05-18, JasonL wrote:

Vincent:

Thanks for letting us engage.

Ben:

Yep, I did, and I'm not sure why I didn't post both, probably because I fogot.  Understood that we're talking past each other here, and acknowledge that we'll just have to agree to disagree on this.

For the record, from the same source, here's violence

violence

n 1: an act of aggression (as one against a person who resists); "he may accomplish by craft in the long run what he cannot do by force and violence in the short one" [syn: force] 2: the property of being wild or turbulent; "the storm's violence" [syn: ferocity, fierceness, furiousness, fury, vehemence, wildness] 3: a turbulent state resulting in injuries and destruction etc.

So, uh, seems to me that connoting that this means abusive, wrong, ect is still going on.

Cheers,

Jason
"Oh, it's you...
deadpanbob"



 

This makes...
initials
...go...
short response
optional explanation (be brief!):

if you're human, not a spambot, type "human":