anyway.



thread: 2009-05-12 : Right to Dream: at least take away THIS

On 2009-05-13, Vincent wrote:

I am, yes: "Right To Dream isn't embedded in the conflict mechanics. It's about what happens at the table."

I think it is a common fallacy that internally consistent fictional causality = right to dream play, and I am dismissing it.

So yeah! It seems to me like you understand.



 

This makes...
initials
...go...
short response
optional explanation (be brief!):

if you're human, not a spambot, type "human":