thread: 2010-02-25 : Revised Apocalypse World Playbooks
On 2010-05-24, Vincent wrote:
Fantastic, thank you! Amy!
Your comment shows that I've missed communicating the implications I was shooting for. Without ever thinking very hard about it, I just figured that listing man and woman under "looks" would imply an available baseline of casual transgression. No reason you couldn't choose "looks: man" for a female character, for instance.
But making it explicit will mean that it won't rely upon people reading my mind. Consider it done.
