anyway.



thread: 2012-09-10 : So very busy!

On 2012-09-13, Josh W wrote:

I love the "create it as a ___" bit, very clever.

Especially given the idea that you don't segregate the creation rules, you just allow creative freedom in approach, then specify what that freedom aims towards.

Could be a nice bit of "man in the loop".

It's also a little like you're putting those classic "testing archetypes" for the creator subsystems within the text itself. (ie lets make sure the system can do ___)

Nice way to encode and hold yourself to designer intent.



 

This makes...
initials
...go...
short response
optional explanation (be brief!):

if you're human, not a spambot, type "human":